i just saw tim blake nelson’s leaves of grass. it has its own charm in its obvious exposition and symbolism, and so it’s not as eye-rolling as it might be when the earthy rural poetess explains walt whitman to the straight-laced urban(e) philosophy prof. and, in fact, her defense of free form verse, while basic, actually excited me: that each poem has ‘its own interior rhythm’. i don’t think this is just a glib argument for breaking the rules, because it goes both ways – maybe the best villanelles would have stumped their writers in other forms, but it was as villanelles that they really sang. good content is that which finds its form.
its own interior rhythm
i just saw tim blake nelson’s leaves of grass. it has its own charm in its obvious exposition and symbolism, and so it’s not as eye-rolling as it might be when the earthy rural poetess explains walt whitman to the straight-laced urban(e) philosophy prof. and, in fact, her defense of free form verse, while basic, actually excited me: that each poem has ‘its own interior rhythm’. i don’t think this is just a glib argument for breaking the rules, because it goes both ways – maybe the best villanelles would have stumped their writers in other forms, but it was as villanelles that they really sang. good content is that which finds its form.